Loading ...A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church by Warren Cole Smith
Since World War II, evangelicals have emerged, seemingly from nowhere, as a potent political force and the focus of rapidly expanding retail markets. Megachurches and parachurch organizations like Focus on the Family attract both wealth and publicity, allowing them to reach more people than ever before. But something troubling has happened in spite of this expansion. Overall church attendance is not growing. Political clout has not yielded spiritual renewal. America’s high divorce rate is just one of many melancholy cultural indicators that bigger is not necessarily better. Evangelicalism aims to cure these ills. What if, instead, it is actually preying on the body, like a cancerous tumor growing unchecked?
In his new book, A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church, awarding-winning journalist Warren Cole Smith offers an insightful and deeply personal critique of the evangelical movement from the perspective of a long-time evangelical insider. Using solid research and original interviews with some of America’s leading Christian thinkers, Smith offers an assessment of what has gone wrong as evangelicalism has grown in power and size and what must be done if the church is to be salt and light in a culture starved for redemption.
“American evangelicalism, for all the good it has done, is in need of a modern reformation,” Smith states. “There is something toxic in the soil of the evangelical garden, and the poison has been building up over time, tainting everything. It is evident in our quick condemnation of homosexuality or alcohol or gambling, but our indulgence of greed and envy in the form of careerism. It’s there in the hypocrisy of religious-right political leaders quick (and right) to condemn big government and its corrupting power, but who think that the big ministries and megachurches they have created are somehow immune to the same corrupting power.”
A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church reveals the lesser-reported events that have shaped every aspect of modern evangelicalism, starting with the Second Great Awakening (hint: it wasn’t so great). As only a great journalist can, Smith delivers some startling facts and raises serious questions about many of the practices and institutions that define modern evangelicalism including:
· The evangelical myth—is the church really growing?
· Body-count evangelism—makes for impressive stats, but at what cost?
· The Christian Industrial complex—examining a Christian retail industry that generates billions
· The Overhead Church—multimedia presentations a must, no hymnals or bibles necessary
Smith wrote the book not as one who is on the outside looking in, but as one who has chosen to remain on the inside for forty years. As he describes the flawed approach of many of modern evangelicalism’s best-known leaders and organizations, Smith is quick to point out the many problematic activities in which he has actively participated. He longs to see a church that embraces her ancestry, values spiritual depth over bragging rights, and is shaped more by the words of Scripture than by the whims of youth culture.
In the end, Smith’s intention is not simply to lob accusations but to restore health to the body of Christ. “I call it a ‘lover’s quarrel’ because I believe it is important to speak the truth with love, as Scripture commands, but also to speak it as two lovers would,” Smith says. “In a marriage, two become one. When a husband cuts his wife, he injures himself. So it is with the church. We are all members of the body of Christ. When one hurts, we all hurt. Therefore, it is not the goal of this book to destroy, but to encourage, sharpen, and build.”
[hide]
This Title Has Been Closed for Review
:: Special Viral Blogger Section ::
Link-love for your review:
http://loversquarrel.net – the official site for Warren and the book. Nice & clean.
Interview Availability:
Warren is available for blog and podcast interviews. You’ll get his email address if you select A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church for your monthly review.
Your Commitment:
Remember, your commitment is to write a blog post (minimum 50 words) about A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church within 30 days of getting it. Please cut & paste your post underneath this entry. Thank you!
[hide]
Sphere: Related Content
earlbarnett
A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church instantly reminded me of the ominous opening to a popular album: “The car is on fire, and there’s no driver at the wheel…” [1]
In A Lover’s Quarrel…, Warren Cole Smith flexes his literary, anthropological, historical, philosophical, and theological muscles to address a crisis within Evangelical Christianity. According to Smith, the philosophies of the world have enamored American evangelicalism. Smith’s words capture this sentiment well, arguing that
“God wants the church to be the church. It is the church that doesn’t want to be the church. That’s the core problem (pg. 99).”
Moreover, A Lover’s Quarrel… offers a prophetic voice hoping to apply the brakes before the out-of-control Evangelicalism careens off the impending precipice. For Smith, the cliff is a spiritual depravity of self-absorption and cultural ineffectuality. He hopes to apply the brakes to Evangelicalism’s runaway syncretism through an opposition to what Smith calls “sentimentalism,” the romanticizing of reality.
If A Lover’s Quarrel… halts, or even slows the collapse of Evangelicalism, it is due to the accessibility of Smith’s writing and the cogency of his analysis of the Evangelical subculture. One such example is chapter 4: The Christian-Industrial Complex. In this chapter, Smith draws the reader into a deep analysis of the business-orientation of Evangelicalism.
Smith is not afraid to ask the hard question of whether or not Evangelicalism has sold its soul. A Lover’s Quarrel… excels at its readability and impeccable cultural analysis; reminiscent of Randal Balmer’s classic analysis Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory.
Whereas Smith excels at writing and cultural analysis, his historical, philosophical, and theological analyses come up a bit short. Historically, Smith seeks to identify modern evangelicalism with the Second Great Awakening in America. Smith conveniently paints the Second Great Awakening and Charles Finney therein, as a movement of pseudo-religion and heresy. This obviously paints a complex movement responsible for the rise of both the abolitionist and feminist movements, with a overly-simplistic and convenient brush.
Philosophically, his argument that the written word is the “preferred medium” of God (178- 180) is especially disturbing. His argument really is what it seems: Because historically God used words rather than pictures or video screens, we are to do the same. This leads well to our discussion of theology in A Lover’s Quarrel…
Theologically, I really felt this book was a fish out of water. The most obvious manner is in Smith’s thesis that God’s ideal form of communication is the written word. He “proof-texts” his argument, but fails to take into account the living Word of God that is Jesus Christ. Instead, he opts for a flat understanding of the word of God that makes it solely synonymous with the Scriptures. The bible-centricity of such a view instantly marks Smith’s theology as a unusual version of evangelicalism, but evangelical nonetheless.
Moreover, Smith attempts to undercut Evangelical theologies such as pre-millennialism and Arminianism, as just two examples. Smith also uses women’s ordination to defend the theological collapse of a denomination (143). He also identifies penal substitutionary atonement as a “core Christian value” (142).[2] Despite being a great writer and Spirit-filled critic, Smith’s theology is off-the-wall and seriously detracts from and undercuts the argument of the book.
Overall, I recommend this book to anyone who is disenfranchised with American Evangelicalism. Despite its shortcomings, A Lover’s Quarrel… is worth reading if you have an interest (or investment) in American Evangelicalism. Warren Smith Cole provides an alternate view of the Church to counter the out-of-control Evangelicalism in America. If you enjoyed Frank Viola’s Pagan Christianity, you will love A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church.
This review is also posted on my blog: http://earlbarnett.com/wordpress/?p=862
[1] F#A#oo – Godspeed You! Black Emperor (1997)
[2] Smith only argues that substitutionary atonement is a core belief. But he excludes Charles Finney’s governmental theory of atonement from being a “substitutionary theory.” The only remaining way of understanding Smith’s usage of “substitutionary” is synonomously with “penal substitutionary.”
Jul 16th, 2009
spiritofburning
Some messages are bound to polarize a crowd. “A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church,” by Warren Cole Smith, is one of those titles. In the book, Smith identifies many diseases that plague the Church in America. He tips overs many “sacred cows” of American conservatism such as seeker-sensitive methods, Christian media, and a man-centered gospel.
I appreciated the attitude that Smith used when clearly communicating his observations. In his foreword, entitled, “To Build Up, Not to Tear Down,” he explained how his motivation to share came out of a love for the Church. Just as a spouse must sometimes confront relational issues head on for the sake of love, so Smith felt compelled to share things that he identified as contrary to the pure religion of the Gospel.
Though he adequately identified some problems with the evangelical church in America, I felt his book was lacking in a suitable response to these problems. I was in agreement most of the way through the book until I reached the end and had not encountered a clear method to respond to these problems.
I think it’s definitely worth the read. If you’re aware that the evangelical church has some serious problems, especially in the way we relate to society, this book will help put words, stories, and facts to the feelings you have. If you’re unaware of the problems in the Church in America, this book is bound to ruffle your feathers, but do so in enough gentleness that you can sensibly consider his argument.
Jul 18th, 2009
addsalt
Summary of the book here
To start, I respect the position of the book (and I assumed from the book’s title I would be nodding my head in agreement through most of it). Many of us are reviewing the results of the last 40 years of Christianity and wondering where we have all gone wrong. For those who are just starting walking down this road of thought it is normal to want to find who was responsible and place blame for any failure (I certainly have had these sentiments). Mr. Smith seems to take a very hard approach against many of the religious figureheads of our time (Billy Graham, Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, etc) – and I can suspect it is because the fires of frustration are understandably burning high. While it is something I understand, cutting down those men who have devoted their entire lives to doing exactly what they felt God calling them to do is not the correct way forward.
Unfortunately from a literary stance, I found little direction in the book. I cannot come away with what the point the author wanted me to walk away with, aside from the fact that he is frustrated with the current state of the church. Unfortunately I think the wonderfully benign title of A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church would unfortunately be better called A Rant against the Evangelical Church.
It is obvious that the Christian machine has pulled much of the faith away from doing what is “right” towards doing what is popular or profitable. Unfortunately, it looks very hypocritical to be throwing shame on the income of Christian non-profit organisation from a for-profit book published by the huge International Bible Society (the organisation that holds the copyright for the NIV version of the bible).
From a logic standpoint, I found most of the arguments unconvincing (even while ultimately agreeing with the conclusions). I agree that historical Christianity is important as our foundation, but the book does not deal with exactly why this should be important. I agree that large churches often miss out on developing their members, but without strong argument I would not automatically conclude that the consolidation of churches (reduction in small and growth of the large) would necessarily be problematic. In the discussion between the medium and the message, the fact that medium plays a part in the message is stated – but never discussed. The chapter concludes that we are “not faithfully preaching it (the word of god)”, which is in turn a problem with our message, not the medium.
Much of the book is devoted to specific personalities recognisable in Christianity. I think we have learned that a commitment at a rally does not always mean something. It is a painful lesson to learn. To hold Billy Graham and Bill Hybels accountable for all the ills with the church is misguided at best. I have listened to both Billy Graham and Bill Hybels. I don’t have to always agree with the methods to conclude that both men were devoted to doing what they felt called to do. We should all be so excited when thousands would gather to hear us speak of God (I seem to remember that Jesus and the disciples use this method more than once).
I found it downright unacceptable to flat out deem Rick Warren as a liar (in the heading Lies, More Lies, and Statistics) because he read an article in World Magazine and he could not reconcile the church numbers (148). Again, I see much in megachurches that should be done much differently, but making very unfounded accusations is not the way we as the church should try to bring about change.
I absolutely love the title of the book, but found few pages inside it that didn’t make me sigh with disappointment.
Review: A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church
Jul 19th, 2009
mattjudkins
I just finished reading Warren Cole Smith’s A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church. You can find the official website here. You could probably more accurately call this book, Smith’s Quarrel with the Republican-Evangelical Alliance, Historical Amnesia, Megachurches, Christian Consumerism, Pragmatic Evangelism, and the Uncritical Embrace of Technology. If you’re in the camp that equates the Evangelical Church with these six characteristics, then you’ll likely be on board with Smith’s critiques. However, I don’t tend to lump these together uncritically.
For instance, in the chapter on Megachurches, Willow Creek and Joel Osteen’s congregation are both included as examples of the triumph of sentimentality. I, however, wouldn’t lump these two in any category outside of sheer size. It is also hard to see the hard and fast link between technology and megachurch growth while I’m serving in a megachurch that doesn’t use video screens during Sunday morning services.
All in all, Smith’s critiques aren’t critiques the average seminary student hasn’t heard by their second or third year. Smith’s audience is likely laypeople who already have an issue with any of the things listed above.
Strangely enough, Smith’s conclusions seem to come from a different planet than his critiques. While reading the first six chapters, I thought it would be impossible for me to recommend this book to anyone. Chapters seven and eight softened my stance. Strangely enough, Smith’s prescription for fixing what he describes in the first six chapters is a movement of strategic church planting movements and strong biblical communities. In fact, I find it hard to see the connections between what he describes and what he prescribes. However, in the end, I would say I agree with the prescription even if I don’t totally agree with the diagnosis.
Jul 21st, 2009
mwwestmoreland
Read Mattjudkins review first. I think he is on target with his review.
Smith’s A LOVER’S QUARREL offers a much needed critique of contemporary American evangelicalism broadly construed. For those who sense that “the church” has lost its way, A LOVER’S QUARREL will aid in both diagnosing the problem and prescribing a solution. The book is abundant in its examples (although sometimes too anecdotal), which gives the reader a clearer picture of what the ailment of “the church” is. By using loose argumentation, Smith is speaking more to the layperson rather than academics who, more than likely, already knew the material within the book. This is not a critique of the layperson or Smith. Rather, the book is honest in its reaching the laity and written in love in hopes of saving evangelicalism from its downward spiral. The criticisms therein are much needed. As an academic, I would have preferred a more rigorous approach to the topic. I also think Smith misrepresents several philosphical and theological positions; e.g., atonement theory, annhilationism, universalism, the Enlightenment, and “postmodernism.” While Smith is on track, he remains shallow in his understanding of various concerns. Having said this, I do recommend the book as launching point for more study.
Jul 22nd, 2009
cirdog
Christians are notorious for shooting their own wounded. One evidence of this could be the recent spate of books written by theologians, ex-ministers, or disenfranchised Christians, who take aim at the American Church, its leaders, its beliefs, and its trappings. Statistics seem to bear out a drift away from traditional religion and a growing gap between what we believe and what our religious institutions have become. But to what degree is this barrage of critical buckshot “removing cancer” or “shooting our wounded”?
I, too, have many gripes about the state of contemporary evangelicalism. But who doesn’t? Images of a contrite Ted Haggard and a perpetually sunny Joel Osteen are just bookends to the disturbing collage that is the American church. Still, I’ve been reluctant to join this growing legion of dissenters for several reasons. Despite its charlatans, sex scandals, money grubbers, and milquetoasts, it remains the Body of Christ and there are many, many, fine people within it. No matter how deep the dysfunction, Christians are commanded to “love one another.” Perhaps that’s why the title of Warren Cole Smith’s new book caught my attention — A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church.
The objects of Smith’s “quarrel” are not trivial. Nor are they anything new. For decades, American Christians have been warned about the corrosive effects of modernity and materialism, the danger of relying upon marketing models and the therapeutic industry to grow people and churches. Smith rightly connects evangelicalism’s waning growth and cultural impact — and some of its more blatant public sins — to deeper philosophical, theological, compromises. Along the way, the author uses history, methodology and current events to deconstruct “The Evangelical Myth” and its components.
Herein lies the bulk of the book and the meat of Smith’s objections. But chronicling the deficiencies of the evangelical church is like shooting fish in a barrel — it’s just way too easy. To Smith’s credit, his analysis is neither mean-spirited nor superficial; he writes as one who has a genuine stake in the people and the outcome. But after a while I found myself growing tired of the analysis and wanting constructive answers. Which is where the book lacks, in my opinion.
For instance, Smith asks, “Does Scripture dictate a preferred medium for the communication of the gospel?” (pg. 176). It’s a loaded question, especially after the author has spent significant time establishing that “media are not neutral,” (pg. 178), and that radio and television have negatively influenced how we perceive and present the Gospel. He answers, “Words – and not pictures, drama, or any other medium – seem to be the preferred strategy of God, of Jesus, and of Scripture” (Pg. 179). Of course, by entering history when He did, God limited His “preferred strategy” to those of the times. But is that an endorsement of one method and a disavowal of every future medium? Furthermore, Smith must concede that technology assists the spread of his own message — even if that message calls into question the very medium he employs.
Perhaps the most disturbing of Smith’s inferences occur in his identifying modern evangelicalism with the Second Great Awakening, and then casting the former movement in near heretical terms. As such, in Smith’s estimate, Charles Finney is the precursor to today’s televangelist, wheedling “commitments” from his listeners with melodramatic prowess, and unfurling the “body count” as evidence of God’s blessing. Along the way, oodles of evangelical “icons” are thus incriminated. But really, was Billy Graham that destructive to the fabric of American Christianity? There’s no question that Arminianism and premillennialism have shaped certain aspects of evangelical methodology. But is Reformed theology really the antidote? In this, I found Smith’s “quarrel” a bit more like a “quibble.”
Perhaps Smith’s lack of concrete solutions is indicative of the nature of the problem. Evangelicalism’s issues are vastly more complex than a single solution will provide. Yes, the Church should contemplate the downside of electronic media. But by not using the mediums of the day, Christians risk isolating themselves from the culture they are commissioned to reach. We are right to question the real impact of mega-churches. But is adopting a numeric cap upon the local church the real answer? Are hymns and liturgies imperative to the health of a church, and are overhead projectors really that big a deal?
It’s hard to argue with the thesis of A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church, and in that I would recommend it. No objective observer could rightly give American evangelicalism a clean bill of health. Warren Cole Smith does a good job cataloging the symptoms and exploring their root causes, asking provocative questions in the right spirit. My quarrel is not with the author’s diagnosis, as much as his treatment.
Review: A Lover’s Quarrel With The Evangelical Church
Jul 23rd, 2009
TatPriest
As I was reading A lover’s quarrel with the Evangelical Church by Warren Cole Smith, I was reminded of two spinster sisters with whom I used to attend church. Anytime soloist taped music in the service, the sisters would get up and leave. For them any departure from the piano or organ was a musical heresy of such magnitude that they could not remain in the sanctuary. Smith’s laundry list of problems with the evangelical church is long and involved. The list includes everything from mega-churches to the use of LCD projectors in the church. As an ex-evangelical, I agree with Smith that there is much to complain about in the evangelical church, my biggest complaint is the over emphasis of things like original sin and the great commission (…go and make disciples) to the detriment of the importance of love and the great commandment (… love the lord your God … and your neighbor as yourself). But I digress.
One of the basic premises Smith offers is that “ideas have consequences.” I agree whole-heartedly with this premise except to say that Smith is way off base with many of his ideas. A couple of thoughts I noted while reading A lover’s quarrel…
In the Triumph of Sentimentality, Smith dismisses many of today’s mega-church and “feel good” pastors. Of course, at the top of his list is Joel Osteen. Smith quotes Michael Horton who says, “God is not the center of his theology, the center is me and my happiness.” While this may be true about Osteen’s message (I really don’t know whether it is or not) Smith through Horton says that the message needs to be more about “sin.” Whether the message is about me and my happiness or me and my sin the self remains at the center which is theologically flawed and in direct opposition to the teachings of Jesus which put love for others at the center.
The Chapter on the Christian Industrial Complex give Smith the opportunity to criticize everything from Promise Keepers (they sold t-shirts) to Christian TV to Christian music and on and on. Glaringly absent from Smith’s list of evil-doers is Pat Robertson and CBN, who get barely a mention. As the man who praised Charles Taylor of Liberia (Taylor is now on trial for crimes against humanity) and got obscenely rich off of his TV ministry one would think that Robertson would be at the top of the list in this chapter. Perhaps, and this is pure speculation, Smith and Robertson are in cahoots somehow? And this is an aside but shows the typical evangelical lack of love and propensity to harsh judgment … on page 120 Smith is talking about Bill Mallonee (a Christian musician) and says this, “…Mallonee left evangelicalism (and, it must be said, a failed marriage) behind and is now a practicing Roman Catholic …” My thought is, why must it be said that he left a failed marriage? Does it add to the discussion? Or does it just show that in Smith’s eyes Mallonee is somehow unworthy of the title evangelical?
In the chapter on Body Count evangelism Smith praises as an authentic revival the First Great Awakening and condemns as superficial the Second Great Awakening. He reserves special condemnation for Charles Finney (who he also credits for planting the seeds of the Mormon church(p.143) ) and through some pretty complicated steps, Billy Graham who expressed admiration for Finney. I’m no big fan of huge crusades but I think most would agree that Graham has done a great deal of good in the world. Smith also condemns Graham b/c Graham stated that it will be up to God whether or not the Hindus, Muslims, and others get into heaven or not (p.145). Smith wants unqualified condemnation and first class trips to hell for all outside of his brand of Christendom but like Graham, I’d like to leave that up to God.
It’s almost laughable that in the Great Stereopticon Smith condemns the use of overhead projectors and video in church (remember the spinsters?). According to Smith, the preached word is God’s approved method of message delivery. All other delivery methods be damned. Funny, but productive? No. Helpful? Not even close.
Finally in the chapter on True Religion Smith states that the original church grew without any of these gimmicks or gadgets and the church today should follow it’s example (p. 209). Really, there was no technology in the first century? Though Paul’s messages often were tailored to his audience, one only need to read about his sermon to the altar of the unknown god or his quoting of “your poets” to know that Paul was culturally relevant, Smith seems to reject anything that is new or different.
In the introduction, Smith says that the hardest part of writing a book is looking for quotations to use. To me this says that Smith set out to write an inflammatory thesis and then looked for tidbits from others to support his position. In the end he adds nothing but complaints to the discussion. Don’t waste your time with this book.
A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church
Jul 24th, 2009
nimblewill
“My name is Warren Smith and I am a recovering evangelical” begins this “Lover’s Quarrel.”
Not only a fellow UGA grad but Mr. Smith and I have come to some of the same conclusions about evangelicalism of the 21st century church. I was drawn to the title of this book because I an in some ways simply mad at some of the things that “church” has become. To my surprise Smith addresses some of the very things that I myself have issues with.
For instance some of my biggest gripes are the seemingly lack of community within the church and the feeling that I have become more important as a “pew warmer” and thither than as a family member. Another problem is that while there are many needs in America the institutional church spends more resources to make its members comfortable than to meet the needs of the lost.
Smith addresses these things and others in his “Lover’s Quarrel” and does so honestly. Many, including myself, see these problems but offer no real solutions. Smith attempts to do so. He also names names including some high profile names that made me afraid that the book was going to be struck by lightening.
In his forward Smith tells us the purpose of the book: “to build up and not tear down.” He offers chapters with titles such as; “The Christian Industrial Complex” (that deals with the issue of most all aspects of Christianity becoming money making schemes) and “Body Count Evangelism” (which is self explanatory if you have been in church for long).
In my opinion Smith is at his best when he puts on his historian hat. His commentary on the formation of modern evangelicalism and those on the First and Second Great Awakenings were fascinating to read. I actually found myself not being able to put it down a few times.
If Smith’s Lover’s Quarrel answered some of my questions he left me with some knew ones. In particular, if God is sovereign (Smith comes across as a staunch Calvinist) as I believe He is, then He is neither surprised nor disillusioned with the state of Christianity. Smith at least left me with the possibility that God is somewhere wringing his hands over our inability to do “church” right.
Next, if the “medium is the message” as Smith says and the only biblical medium of spreading the Gospel is preaching then why was his view of what was to be preached not covered in more detail. Smith seemed to suggest that “Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God” type sermons needed to be revived.
If you, like myself, have wonderings about the state of the church and how we arrived to where we are, read the book; even if (maybe especially if) you are a Christian professional or layman who is satisfied with your current evangelical experience.
Jul 25th, 2009
Michelle Van Loon
Journalist Warren Cole Smith pens a work that is diagnostic in nature, and focuses, as the title implies, on the woes of modern evangelicalism.
Those woes are not breaking news to anyone who has been involved in the evangelical world: provincialism, sentimentality, the merchandising of faith, media, decisions instead of disciples, megachurches. Smith is a seasoned reporter, and illustrates each of his points with solid, supportive stories.
Though he occasionally offers some prescriptions for these woes (church multiplication by church-planting congregations instead of the bigger/better/more of mega-church addition, for instance) the book’s focus leans toward thoughtful lament. He doesn’t offer many solutions for the problems he describes.
Five or ten years ago, this book would have been cutting edge critique. But there has been soooo much written about the often-unlovable evangelical church during the last decade that it didn’t feel like much new ground was covered in this volume. It would be a quick primer for someone new to the subject matter, and I hope that Smith considers penning a follow-up that offers a way forward from this sad, hurty place in which we find ourselves.
Jul 26th, 2009
jroddy
I chose to read this book solely based on the title. I also feel like I am in a lover’s quarrel with the evangelical church and I wanted to find out how someone else was getting along in the scuffle. I must admit that I enjoyed reading this book and did so in only a matter of days, which is fast for me. I found it very fascinating to read about the rise of a few mega churches and also much of Christian media.
This book confirmed for me much of what I struggle with in the evangelical church, namely that we have replaced our mission of discipleship and life transformation with “body count evangelism” (the author’s term) and that the only measure of success is numerical growth. I do feel that the author did a good job of stating some of the more glaring holes that many in the evangelical circle seem to ignore. I only hope that people can grasp the bigger picture that Smith is trying to paint.
I do however wish that Smith would have tried to encompass more of the broad scope of evangelism. I think there is more going on in some of the lesser denominations that are not of the Reformed/Calvinistic persuasion than Smith gave attention. I also wish he would have studied more of what’s going on in the Emerging/Emergent conversation than just to dismiss them as nihilists.
I will conclude by affirming that I do agree with Smith’s assertion that we have an understanding of history and how the medium of our message should line up with our theology. I would encourage others to read this book as I feel that it is a good conversation starter, especially for those who find themselves disenfranchised from the modern evangelical circle.
Jul 26th, 2009
Jeff
I have to say, I had a pretty complex reaction to this book. I selected to review the book because its title and description suggested to me that it was an unflinching look at some of the issues of the modern church. (And for the most part, it was.)
I thought the book would give an honest assessment of the lasting fruit of the evangelical movement, and tackle issues like greed and corruption. (And for the most part, it did.)
I did NOT expect it to be a book largely centered around and promoting Calvinistic theology. And that killed it for me.
If I had wanted to read a book about Calvinistic doctrine, I would have picked a book whose title suggested it. While making some very valid points about the state of evangelicalism, its detachment from the broader history of the church, its failure to retain a large percentage of its converts over the long term, and its product/brand industrialism…the author’s main point seemed to be theological in nature, using the symptoms described above as evidence of faulty theology. Warren Cole Smith, a journalist, never specifically says he subscribes to Reformed theology; however, his multitude of favorable references to Calvin, Jonathan Edwards and Reformed doctrine (not to mention his negative references to Charles Finney and Arminianism) make his bias clear.
The problem I have with this is that the book was billed as a journalistic expose, not an argument of a theological viewpoint. And for this, I fault the author with the same bait-and-switch tactics he would no doubt accuse evangelicalism of. I simply do not like being taken in under false pretense.
I mentioned that Smith is a journalist. And to the extent that he functions as one, I think he actually does a good job of it. When he is presenting facts and sorting through the data, the information he presents is very helpful. While I didn’t concur that all the data points to a problem (he seems to believe the church’s use of modern technology is a negative, for example), there can be no doubt that the evangelical church has some major problems, and he presents that case pretty well. I found myself heartily agreeing with him on several of these points, and he filled in a lot of historical gaps for me along the way.
It is when he began drawing conclusions about the data that his true agenda came to the forefront, and his journalism began to fall short. Some of his conclusions were over-drawn, in fact. For example, he repeatedly stated that evangelicalism’s separation from the church of history flirted with denying the Incarnation of Christ–without ever really explaining clearly how the two were connected. Also, he gave two quotes (with no context) from revivalist Charles Finney to claim that Finney rejected the core doctrines of God’s sovereignty and man’s sinfulness–when in my view, the quotes did no such thing. I am neutral about Finney, myself, because I don’t know enough about his doctrine to say either way. But any journalist, especially Christian, should know better than to label someone a heretic without providing more substantive proof of such a claim.
But even more provocative than this is the fact that Cole’s overall conclusions about what should be done to rescue evangelicalism were more about theology than they were about methodology. What is surprising to me is that I would have thought someone having a “lover’s quarrel” with evangelicalism would lean to the liberal side of things; in fact, Cole does the opposite. To me, there was a clear “this-is-the-right-way-to-believe” vibe in what he wrote that left little latitude for other interpretations; and again, he did not properly tie the data to his claims.
It isn’t that I have a particular issue with or grudge against Calvinists or Reformed theology; I tend to take theology with a grain of salt, anyway, including my own. My beef was that I came away feeling utterly preached to and lectured, rather than simply informed. I thought journalists were supposed to be neutral.
BOTTOM LINE: Can’t recommend it, at least, not as a fair assessment of the issues tackled in the book. The strong Reformed bias overshadows the good information that can be gleaned. (At least, it did for me.) This is not the kind of book that convinces people to change their thinking–it will likely only rally those who already agree with it. Which means Calvinists would probably love it.
Thumbs down for me.
Jul 26th, 2009
NeilCraigan
I was intrigued by the title and thoroughly disappointed with the content.
The very idea that a hymnal is something that “has historically been considered vital to church life.” p.110 is just absurd. For most of church history there has been no hymnal, a hymnody, but not a hymnal. Indeed the hymnal that forced people to look down at words on a page is a product of the print medium, something that receives no critique the way other more modern communication mediums do.
Of course words are God’s preferred medium p.179 but there is no distinction made between the spoken word and the written word, it is almost as if the two are synonymous but they aren’t.
Attacks on Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, Billy Graham and others just further frustrated me as I was hoping to find something redemptive in this book, some solution to the problem, yet nothing substantive was offered, only the feeling of condemnation. Certainly there was a rallying cry to return to a certain theological framework, which appeared to be a Calvinism as defined by the Synod of Dort.
This is one book I was glad to be done reading and not one I would recommend to others.
Jul 27th, 2009
EnglewoodReview
My review of
A LOVER’S QUARREL WITH THE EVANGELICAL CHURCH For NEXT-WAVE.org
http://bit.ly/Tg3B0
Warren Cole Smith is an evangelical, but he is one who has deep concerns about the trajectory of American evangelicalism over the last 25 years. Smith, publisher of the Evangelical Press News Service, has compiled these concerns in the challenging new book, A Lover’s Quarrel with The Evangelical Church. I picked this book up expecting to find many theological critiques of evangelicalism (individualism, bondage to modernity, etc.) that would be similar to those that I regularly hear from my peers in post-evangelical churches – except, of course, coming from one who has chosen to stay committed to the evangelical church. Thus, it came as a surprise that Smith’s concerns were not primarily of this sort. Indeed, Smith is content to accept the basic theological moorings of evangelicalism, and focuses his questions instead on the ethics and praxis of American evangelicalism.
Smith begins with a challenge that will resonate with most post-evangelical readers, a critique of the evangelical attraction to power, both right-wing political power and the power of numbers manifested in the church growth movement, etc.
…
Read the full review:
http://bit.ly/Tg3B0
Jul 29th, 2009
JaimeeHolmes
MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2009
An Unfortunate Review.
Of a book I really really don’t want to read.
I was super excited to get Warren Cole Smith’s new book A Lover’s Quarrel With the Evangelical Church. I cannot, however, bring myself to read it in it’s entirety, so forgive the sad, half-hearted review.
From the title, I assumed (and you know what “they” say that means!) that it would be a book written from a “lover’s” perspective. Like I said, I did not read the book in it’s entirety, so I could be wrong based on later chapters… but the part that I did read read more like a “christianized” tabloid. I actually feel a bit guilty for reading as much as I did about some of the failings (perceived or actual) of Christians listed quite prolifically in the early chapters of the book. I apologize to the author if I am giving an inaccurate account of the overall heart of the writing… The style and especially the content of the beginning is not something I am comfortable reading.
For those who may be interested in learning more about the book, you can go to this site, which belongs to the author.
Reluctantly,
Jaimee
Aug 3rd, 2009
mhasty
A Lover’s Quarrel With The Evangelical Church by Warren Cole Smith is exactly as the title describes, a lover’s quarrel. The book opens with “My name is Warren, and I’m a recovering evangelical.” In the book Smith offers his honest perspective of his problems with the evangelical church. What’s interesting is that all the while Smith claims to be an evangelical. It’s an insiders look, saying “Here are some problems I see. I don’t like them but, I’m apart of this as well and I think we can come together and fix these things.”
Some of the main issues Smith tackles are those of the “Christian-Industrial Complex” in which he brings up topics like Christian publishing houses, record labels, and the like that make millions of dollars a year and questions their motives.
He criticizes what he calls “Body-Count Evangelism” in which numbers become more important that the souls of those people. Smith makes a very true statement: “In the era of body-count evangelism, people become statistics. True salvations become opportunities not for joy, by for bragging.” It’s a sad truth that I’ve seen this very thing take place. Thankfully not in the church I’m currently serving. I would say it’s also easy to look at the surface of some things and make judgement calls rather than seeing what happens behind the scenes. Sure there are people that slip through the cracks… I wish this wasn’t the case but, the truth is in large churches it just happens sometimes. The goal is not to allow anyone to simply walk an isle and leave. We want to win people to Jesus Christ by sharing His love and message. We want to then not count them as a number for a quota, but instead grow them in their spiritual walk with Jesus Christ and then send them out to the world as representatives of the love and message of Jesus Christ they themselves came to know. I’m thankful that it’s more than numbers at my church home. I’m thankful we’re not a statistic and that we don’t count them.
Overall Smith writes with honesty and passion towards the topics he addresses. However, there are moments when it seems that Smith is ranting more than examining and condemning more than diagnosing. Early in the book Smith is a but confusing with his writing and mentions about 4-5 items that are the “theme” of the book. I felt myself confused about what exactly the theme of the book was and wondering why my conclusions were different than the author’s expressed ones. The book didn’t pick up for me until about the third chapter. A Lover’s Quarrel With The Evangelical Church is a decently written and raises some good questions that all evangelical churches need to examine and be reminded of.
http://thegreatrescue.blogspot.com/2009/08/lovers-quarrel-with-evangelical-church.html
Aug 3rd, 2009
misterlib
Rarely do I read through a non-fiction book as fast as I do fiction; however, this book captured my attention and kept me reading at a crazy pace. The questions he asked kept me on my toes. One of the first points he gets at is the outright disregard for historicity. Many of us in the evangelical movement assume that we have answers for what the Church should be. But if you’re anything like me, you don’t even really know how we got here. And that matters. Especially if we want to move forward. We can look at the current situation and try to plan a path for the future, but we would be fools to do that without seeing how we got where we are. Most of the book is written through the lens of a book written in 1948, Roger Weaver’s Ideas Have Consequences. I fully recommend it to anyone involved in being the Church. And more than that, I would love for you to buy it and then schedule a date when we can sit down, drink some coffee, and talk about it. I’m not sure about everything in the book (some of his staunch Calvanism shows through a bit too strong at some points), but I am definitely asking myself some of the same questions and not making light of his answers to those questions.
http://misterlib.com/2009/08/10/a-lovers-quarrel-with-the-evangelical-church/#more-738
Aug 10th, 2009
sheyduck
You are a backslider! You’re the worst kind of “Christian;” a lukewarm, liberal Christian. You probably don’t’ even believe in the Bible!
So I can imagine the 18 year old Steve Heyduck saying, were he to meet the 45 year old Steve Heyduck.
I’m not nearly so sure what that 18 year old might have said to Warren Cole Smith after reading this book.
Smith identifies the problem early; on page 4 he states: “The evangelical church has spawned the megachurch. It had become about power buidling, not power sharing. And it certainly was not about power sacrificing.” But he still identifies himself as evangelical, so continues the book from the perspective of wanting to identify the prolems and issues with the intent of being part of the solution.
Smith’s work is very helpful in identifying a couple of trends within evangelicalism. First, he charts the history of the modern evangelical movement flowing from the Second Great Awakening rather than the first. This is significant because the Second Great Awakening was marked much more by emotional experience of conversion than by actual transformation of individuals and then society around them.
Second, I think Smith is dead-on in characterizing much of evangelicalism as caught up in the “Christian-Industrial Complex.” But are there really any coherent arguments out there today that would disagree that the church as a whole, and the evangelical church included, has drunk too deeply from the waters of consumerism and market capitalism?
I have already posted my concern over Smith’s chapter on “the Great Stereopticon.” Let me summarize it this way. Smith is grieved at the priority given to technology in worship-chiefly the overwhelming move towards the use if electronic image-making in worship. Smith concludes: “Words-and not pictures, drama, or any other medium-seem to be the preferred strategy fo God, of Jesus, and of scripture.” (p.179)
His problem is that the example he gives of the use of words is Jonathan Edwards – lead theologian of the First Great Awakening. Edwards is perhaps most famous for “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.”
This is not the “word” to which Jesus had access, however. Jesus lived 1500 years before the printing press, Edwards more than a century after. Shane Hipps does a fine job explaining the difference the printing press made in Christendom in his The Hidden Power of Electronic Culture.
To summarize my contention against Smith’s assertion that God’s preferred medium of communication is the word is that the “Word became flesh, and dwelt among us.” God’s preferred medium was the Incarnation, not the printed word!
I like Smith’s suggestions for the evangelical church:
1. focus on church planting rather than mega-church building
2. regain a perspective on vocation
3. disciple for depth as opposed to numerical gain.
Read this book. Engage Smith’s arguments. The tone is conciliatory and encouraging.
Much as I wonder hypothetical conversations with an earlier, far less mature version of myself, most of my growth has been connected with the milieu that is Smith’s focus; for this connection and history I am grateful.
Aug 11th, 2009
Matthew Raley
Warren Cole Smith has written an indispensable book. I believe he diagnoses the sicknesses of evangelicalism correctly, and he does so in detail, sparing the reader none of the gravity or complexity. A Lover’s Quarrel has rare strengths.
First, Smith has been around. He’s seen most of the subcultures within evangelicalism, and his personal experience of wandering in this wilderness goes back almost four decades. Not to put too fine a point on it, he’s an elder – the kind of man we badly need right now.
Second, Smith is a seasoned reporter. One reason he has seen so much territory is that he has reported for the Evangelical Press News Service for years. Most Christian books on the subject of why we’re so bad off make no pretense of documenting a story, naming names, and holding to standards of journalism. Smith has pounded the pavement to get this story, and his disciplined reporting puts him in a different category from mere opinion-mongers. His reporting on Jack Abramoff and Ralph Reed, to tug just one thread, is illuminating and adds depth to his larger argument.
Third, Smith brings intellectual weight to his diagnoses. He draws upon the critiques of modern life and media by Richard Weaver and Neil Postman, among others.
Most writing about evangelicalism treats “the culture” as a post-war artifact, telling us yet again that the World War II generation was more institutionally oriented than Generation Next, or whatever – stuff that basically comes from marketing literature. Even a well-documented book like UnChristian is essentially a public relations consult. These books can sometimes tell us what is happening, but rarely why.
Smith understands that evangelicals have embraced the vast scale of modern life without asking whether that life is a fantasy. Huge churches with impersonal systems, vast parachurch enterprises with assets in the hundreds of millions of dollars, mass media strategies that address no one in particular – we have invested in these structures without considering what harm they do to our face-to-face relationships. There are reasons why we committed this folly, and history can tell us what they were.
A Lover’s Quarrel describes the “new provincialism” of evangelicals, the blithe dismissal of the importance of history and ideas in practical ministry. The book also dissects the sentimentality of evangelicals, their refusal to face reality. Smith’s portrayal of “the Christian-Industrial Complex” shows that the media world perverts the message of the Gospel not just because of the love of money, but because of things like Christian radio’s devotion to its fantasy-Mom, “Becky.”
These narratives are informed by long-standing critics of media and society, like Weaver and Postman, who were sounding alarms while evangelicals were lost in a dream world. The historical and intellectual sense of proportion Smith brings to this subject are badly needed.
Fourth, Smith offers a path out of the evangelical mess, one that restores life to a relational scale, both with human beings and with God. The path is that of vocation, the ancient and biblical notion of calling.
But I’d hate to spoil the end of a great read.
Aug 13th, 2009
pstrben
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Book Review
The book A Lovers Quarrel with the Evangelical Church by Warren Smith is both stimulating and somewhat disappointing. It’s stimulating in that I am glad that some people are aware that the evangelical church doesn’t seem like she has a handle on our culture. The church seems like it is loosing or has lost her influence on our culture. More later.
I also was disappointed with this book because I was expecting more ideas about what to do about this “lack”. I suppose that we could “go back” to what worked before the second great awakening (as the author seems to suggest) but it seems to me that we’re past that and rather than instituting an archaic way of doing things I’d like to be able to take what we are already doing (or should be doing) and re-work it so it can be what God wants.
I am like Warren – I love the church. I believe that God has called me to help prepare His Bride (the church) for His return. One of the things that frustrates me is that people come to know the Lord and then when times get tough (or easy) they leave the church and blame (or forget) God. I agree with Warren in that we (established churches) have watered down the Gospel and made it easy for people to “be saved” when in fact people really need to understand what they’re signing up for when they receive Christ as Saviour and LORD.Too many people have simply made a ‘decision’ to follow Christ but have no desire for or understanding of the commitment necessary to allow God to be your LORD and Saviour.
This book presents a very real problem (the lack of influence the church has on our culture and the operating mentality a lot of churches utilize to ‘market’ themselves to an apathetic culture). As a pastor in a church I am pleased with the call to be more Scripturally based in the discipleship options that we implement at our church. It disturbs me that we are quick to utilize books and methods that are written about or based on Scripture but rarely do we simply use Scripture to properly disciple our adherents.
That said, I am a bit disappointed that the author doesn’t seem to go far enough in helping to create a solution to the dilemma that we face in the modern (or post-modern) evangelical church. He seems to be suggesting that our culture and the “Great Stereopticon” have diluted (or even twisted) the Gospel message. In some ways – at least as he points out in his book – I agree but at the same time I believe that a lot of good has come out of the church. People do find wholeness. People do find peace. Peple do find a life-long purpose. People do enter into real community. People do have a life-changing experience with God. I have met these people and I am one of them.
The book is a good ‘wake-up’ but left me wanting more time to work out a better solution to our issues. I would recommend the book but I want to believe that we can redeem the times and this culture through the church – Christ’s Bride – so I’m not sure it’s a good book for someone to read if they already have an axe to grind with the faulty church and simply want more ammunition with which to continue to break down the church
Aug 14th, 2009
pstrben
For the above review, Pstrben’s blog is: http://wanderingwithben.blogspot.com/
Aug 14th, 2009
rahijada
2009-08-19
A Lover’s Quarrel With The Evangelical Church
I recently had the chance to read the book “A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church” by Warren Cole Smith. At first I was excited about the book and getting to dig into it to find out what was wrong with the church today, but ultimately I ended up being disappointed with the content. While I seem to be drawn by literature that critiques the church and Christians in general, saying the things that need to be said but most are too afraid to say, this book ended up being an exception. I probably didn’t like this book because the criticism was geared toward the styles of church I have an affinity toward, but I really tried to read beyond that and to listen to what he was saying.
This book certainly provided food for thought, and there are several pieces of information that I’m glad I read. However, much of the book sounded like the author airing some grudges because of the way things are being done. I believe it was Brian McLaren in his book “More Ready Than You Realize” who stated that so many Christians build up walls between themselves and the things they wish to change simply by having an attitude of self righteousness [my paraphrase]. I felt the author approached the subject matter with a certain piousness that did more to make me defensive than to help me see the “error of my ways”.
I feel that the author had good intentions, but often picked extreme examples to illustrate how bad things have gotten. While I don’t agree with everything the author had to say, I do believe that his points were valid, from a standpoint that newer styles of churches should watch out for some of these pitfalls that others have fallen into. Often times these churches are walking a line that needs to be walked carefully. That being said these churches aren’t all bad, and I believe the author could have made an effort to see the things they are doing that do work. Overall I wasn’t impressed with this book, and probably won’t be recommending it to my friends.
For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ. If any man builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw, his work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each man’s work. If what he has built survives, he will receive his reward. If it is burned up, he will suffer loss; he himself will be saved, but only as one escaping through the flames.
1 Corinthians 3:11-15
To see this review in it’s original form: http://rahijada.blogspot.com/2009/08/lovers-quarrel-with-evangelical-church.html
Aug 19th, 2009
kevinstewart
I just finished reading A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church which I got courtesy of The Ooze Viralbloggers. As Dr. Alex McFarland has said, “This book is for all who are broken over the fact that our nation is spiritually bankrupt, despite a well funded American Christian industry and thousands of Dolby-surround-sound-equipped churches.
In his insightful critique of the evangelical movement and its excesses the book’s author, Warren Cole Smith, takes on such topics as “The Evangelical Myth,” “The Christian Industrial Complex,” and “Body-Count Evangelism.” Smith helps us to see that, even in the church, bad ideas have bad consequences despite good intentions.
Lover’s Quarrel powerfully declares that “God wants the church to be the church and that even the world wants the church to be the church. It’s the church that doesn’t want to be the church. That’s the core problem.”
If you want to check out this book go to the official site for Warren Cole Smith and the book here, where you can read the introduction and also purchase the book.
To see original review : http://kevinstewart.wordpress.com/2009/08/22/a-lovers-quarrel-with-the-evangelical-church/
Aug 22nd, 2009
Loffers
During a holiday in Canada I recently finished reading this book, which took a good while to arrive at my UK home.
It’s rare for me to both agree and disagree violently with a book that I’ve overall enjoyed reading. But that has been my experience with this recent work from Warren Cole Smith. Overall this is a well-written work, showcasing Warren’s skill as an investigative journalist, which certainly helps the reader engage with the case he presents. If I was to have one criticism of Warren’s overall approach to this work it would be that it is far to US-centric for non-American readers; certainly after the first couple of chapters I was getting tired of all examples being related to the US church.
With regards to the style of this investigation into the current malaise affecting the (especially American) Evangelical church, I appreciated the candour with which Warren diagnoses some serious problems but also felt the personal accusations against some living & past evangelical leaders was unnecessarily personal; for example is it necessary to accuse Rick Warren of being a liar or Billy Graham & John Stott of being universalists to establish the points in question? I don’t think so. I will come onto the treatment of past Christian leaders like Charles Finney and Jacob Arminius later; suffice it to say here that I think they also suffer unfairly in this assessment of their approach & theology.
That said, I want to return to starting positively as there is much in this book to commend.
Warren, I feel, does us a service by highlighting a number of problems with the Evangelical Church today. These need to be named so they can be addressed.
1) The myth of a growing church – exposing some of the hyperbole that seeks to present the cannibalisation of moving Christians from smaller local churches into mega-churches as growth (when really the Christian church in the USA and UK is shrinking).
2) A new ‘provincialism’ that ignores lessons from the past (even if I think Warren is selective in the lessons he values being learnt) and does not engage with the good work being done by the theological community (even if I also think Warren does not engage with useful innovations/improved understanding from scholars).
3) The triumph of sentimentality – a version of the Christian faith that is all about me & what will meet my needs (what I once heard John Smith at Greenbelt decry as the Oprah Winfrey version of church).
4) The ‘Christian industrial complex’, which is such a problem that here I think Warren actually went easy on a problem (particularly the Praise & Worship industry) which has polluted both our theology & our corporate experience of real worship with McChurch.
5) Body count evangelism, or as I prefer to call it ‘gospel fodder’ & the endemic problem of seeking impressive growth statistics rather than real disciples (which can actually also be a problem in smaller churches needing the encouragement of an occasional convert and pressurising or misrepresenting a level of interest with a lasting change.
6) The danger of being seduced by the allure of the Media in our multi-media networked society, what Warren so evocatively calls ‘The great Stereoptigan; with the too common result that the media is the message rather than a servant of the message.
As well as this useful critique, in the latter sections of the book, which seek to look more broadly for potential cures for this malaise, I agree with Warren on some of these as well. I too believe smaller churches with genuine community and accountable relationships are important and that conversion to discipleship (as a journey) is what we need to seek not just additive growth in attendees. I was also really heartened to see Warren look wider than the UK, or even any Colonial powers, for positive examples of a better way to ‘do church’. I too believe post-colonial expressions of church in non-Western indigenous communities can teach us a lot about lived out Christian faith in local communities.
However, where I really did disagree with Warren was in the theological aspects of the cure he recommends and the parochial way this option is presented. For Warren, it is obvious that the solution lies with a return to Reformed/Calvinist theology and ideally the practice of certain Presbyterian denominations. As well as disagreeing with this (and actually being very disappointed that after so much good groundwork Warren is looking to a past model for the solution without considering where that fell short), I was offended by Warren’s treatment of the major alternative to this theological school within Protestant Evangelical Theology. This treatment includes scathing attacks on Jacob Arminius & Charles Finney and statements which make clear that Warren view Arminian theology as unbiblical and wrong. This really was too much to bear and the most visibly partisan part of this book. It was interesting that Warren did not reference the positive contributions of John Wesley (including his mutually respectful relationship with Whitfield) nor the contribution of Booth or leading Pentecostal theologians. It was hard not to see this selective reading of the past as somewhat hypocritical given Warren’s own critique of selective presentation of the ‘Second Great Awakening’ by Evangelical leaders.
To read my full review, see: http://web.mac.com/paul.laughlin/Loffers_Lair/Book_Blog/Entries/2009/8/18_A__Lovers_Quarrel_with_the_Evangelical_Church.html
Aug 29th, 2009
Don Boyles
recently completed reading A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church by Warren Cole Smith. I was interested in this book, because I am in love with the evangelical church, but I also have some points of contention with it. I was hoping to find ideas that would support my own feelings and hopefully find some resolutions. This book didn’t provide either. Mr. Smith had an entirely different set of arguments than my own. He is obviously a deep thinker and had obviously invested a lot of time meditating on the subject before the book-writing process ever began.
Let me preface this review by saying that I am not that smart, not nearly as smart as Mr. Smith, anyway, so please filter any comments I have about this book based on that information. It is quite possible that his arguments are simply over my head.
There are several arguments that Mr. Smith makes that do not make logical sense to me. One of his complaints is the rising popularity of using media in worship services. He calls this “the great stereopticon.” His argument seems to be that media such as television and movies has degraded the morality of our country, so it shouldn’t be embraced in the church. Using that logic, I could make the argument that air conditioning has been instrumental in making our society increasingly more lazy, so churches shouldn’t install climate control systems.
There also seems to be a number of contradictions in the book. For instance, he believes that the megachurch model is inherently flawed and tells the story of K.P. Yohannan, the founder of Gospel for Asia, who “resolved not to build a megachurch nor a megaministry” because he saw the inherent flaws in a large organization. He then goes on to tell that one of Gospel for Asia’s closest associations is the Believer’s Church of India which has over 1.7 million members and includes one diocese with 1200 churches, 13 Bible colleges, and 67 Bridges of Hope programs for children. I’m not familiar with the definition of “megaministry”, but that sounds like it leans toward mega.
One point that I agreed with him on was the ineffectiveness of short-term missions and career, non-indigenous missionaries. The model that he described as being the most successful, however, is remarkably similar to Rick Warren and Saddleback Church’s P.E.A.C.E. plan. An irony is that Mr. Smith spends quite a bit of time criticizing Warren and other megachurch pastors.
Another complaint Mr. Smith has is with large evangelistic gatherings and crusades. He then explains that one of Yohannan’s influences was George Verwer, founder of Operation Mobilization, who came to know Christ at a Billy Graham Crusade. To me, this is the resolution to both mine and Mr. Smith’s peeves. Although every ministry or church is inherently flawed, mainly because they are all run by humans which are inherently flawed, it is comforting to know that God is bigger than all their imperfections and short comings. God can take a megachurch ministry such as Saddleback Church or a parachurch ministry such as the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and use it to transform lives and inspire individuals and groups to think of creative ways to reach more people for Christ.
Again, perhaps I am not intellectually qualified to review a book by such an accomplished author, but in my observations, Mr. Smith has more complaints than solutions. I still recommend reading the book, if for nothing more than using it as a prompting to evaluate your ministry. It caused me to take stock of my own ministry goals and motives.
Sep 3rd, 2009
mjoshua
We, the present Body of Christ, are not without our shortcomings. Today, we’ll look at one of those shortcomings and how it can be resolved: new provincialism.
A Lover’s Quarrel…
My job was to review this book. But, reviews usually neglect engagement with the actual material. Instead, I’m starting a dialog and I’m gonna invite the author into the discussion.
What is New Provincialism?
“The modern evangelical church is most decidedly not a church that is rooted in time and place.” (pg. 57)
Provincialism is essentially forgetting where you are in a story.
“New provincialism” is the problem where the church forgets where it is in God’s story.
It’s being Simba, a full-grown lion who is friends with creatures that should be food; eating insects instead of zebras and gazelles. Unless he remembers who he is and where he came from, he will be forever floating as an immature adolescent in an adult body.
Growing up involves gaining a sense of identity.
Christ’s story has always been historically rooted. Disciples of Christ have existed for two millennia. If we lose sight of our spiritual parents throughout time, we’re essentially self-made bastards.
Recovery
“…At maximum, the new provincialism has so dislocated us from history and biblical tradition that the evangelical church risks ceasing to be a Christian church at all.”
If anybody wonders why I’m so emphatically opposed to popular understandings of the end times (premillenial eschatology), it’s because the theology neglects church history and pridefully asserts that it knows better.
Once you forget church history and biblical tradition, it’s easy to get caught up in garbage like the Left Behind series and becoming so survival focused that you forget to actually focus on discipleship and spiritual formation.
Our key to recovery is understanding church history.
True sons stand on the backs of their fathers.
Questions
1. How have you lost your sense of your place in history?
2. What are you doing to recover it?
Sep 3rd, 2009
MikeClawson
I wasn’t quite sure what to expect when I got Warren Cole Smith’s A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church in the mail. The title had intrigued me, and I wondered what kind of issues Smith would raise, and whether they’d be at all similar to my own quarrels with evangelicalism. I didn’t look much closer at the book beyond the title, and once I did, it quickly became apparent that Smith’s complaints were not too likely to mirror with my own. My first clue was the fact that Smith is a regular contributor to WORLD magazine, which is kind of like a print media version of Fox News for the Christian world. The second clue was the list of endorsers, which included several individuals, Dr. Michael Horton and Dinesh D’Souza for instance, with whom I have significant theological and philosophical disagreements. Nonetheless, I was still intrigued enough to keep reading. Besides, it’s always a good idea to expose oneself to differing viewpoints on a regular basis.
What I found, is that I did in fact share a number of Smith’s concerns about contemporary evangelicalism, but for very different reasons, and with very different ideas about the necessary solutions. Oddly enough, at times it even left me wanting to defend some of the same evangelical practices that I would be likely to critique in other contexts (the “seeker-friendly” mega-church movement for instance.) Smith’s main “quarrels” center on the contemporary evangelical sub-culture. He identifies what he sees as five main problems:
1) its disconnection from Christian history or tradition and with little vision for the future (what he calls the “new provincialism”, a term he borrows from poet and essayist Allen Tate);
2) a “triumph of sentimentality”, by which he means what he thinks has been an overemphasis on God’s love and mercy to the exclusion of God’s power and judgment, or human sinfulness;
3) the Christian-industrial complex, which he sees as corrupting true Christian community with marketing and money;
4) “body-count evangelism”, which he blames on the legacy of 19th century evangelist Charles Finney and sees as sacrificing depth of discipleship for the sake of higher numbers of superficial converts; and
5) what he calls “the great stereopticon”, by which he mainly means television, though he would also include most other forms of visual media, and which he thinks undermines God’s “preferred medium” of communication, i.e. words.
It should be said that Smith admits right up front that he is writing for “theologically conservative, evangelical” Christians, so I really can’t fault him when I just flat out disagree with some of his assumptions about the way things ought to be versus the way things are. He’s not writing for someone like me. That said, I found that on at least a few points (especially his critique of the Christian-industrial complex and some aspects of his critique of body-count evangelism) I did agree with his assessment of what was wrong. I just didn’t buy into his assumptions about why they were wrong, or how things ought to be instead. It’s hard to summarize all the ways in which this was the case, but I guess I could just say that his approach was a bit too conservative, Calvinist, dogmatic, and generally negative towards anything new for my taste.
And, to be honest, on a number of points I really felt like he was overstating his case against contemporary evangelicalism, and failing to note that a lot of the current trends (e.g. contemporary worship music, seeker-sensitivity, grace-oriented preaching, visual and dramatic arts in worship, innovative ministry methods, attempts at cultural relevance, etc.) that he criticizes are themselves reactions to and corrections for even bigger problems in the traditional churches that contemporary evangelicalism has evolved out of (e.g. stale and lifeless worship, a ghetto-mentality in churches that turned off newcomers and seekers, an over-emphasis and on moralism and judgmentalism to the exclusion of the “good” part of the “good news”, etc.) Reminding myself of this actually made me more sympathetic towards contemporary evangelicalism than I typically am. In this regard the book felt even more negative and critical than many of us emergent types often get accused of being. Whereas most emergents want to take the good and leave the bad from the evangelical world, for Smith (with the exception of a few positive examples he lifts up at the end) it seemed like it was almost all bad – like evangelicalism had taken a wrong turn shortly after Jonathan Edwards, and has been in a downward spiral ever since.
However, while this book certainly isn’t targeted towards and emergent audience, I have a feeling that it will have a certain appeal to those in the anti-institutional, organic church/simple church stream of the conversation, and especially those who resonate with guys like Frank Viola or George Barna. For those who are deeply disillusioned with the hype and marketing and consumerism of the evangelical sub-culture, or who have been burned-out or repulsed by the superficiality of the mega-church world, this book will speak to those issues. Personally though, I was not impressed, and I found the “positive vision” he tried to cast in the last few chapters to be rather scattered and exceedingly thin (it basically comes down to church planting). For a much more thorough critique of these same sorts of ills (from a pastor and scholar, as opposed to a journalist), I’d instead recommend my friend Dave Fitch’s book “The Great Giveaway: Reclaiming the Mission of the Church from Big Business, Parachurch Organizations, Psychotherapy, Consumer Capitalism, and Other Modern Maladies”. While I don’t always agree with Dave either, I find his take on all this to be much more nuanced and well-argued (not to mentioned geared towards postmoderns like myself) than Smith’s.
Sep 3rd, 2009
Warren Wade
“A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church”, by Warren Cole Smith
Smith’s book is wonderfully timed. Every bookstore you enter whether “secular” or “Christian” greets you with the works of megachurch pastors like Rick Warren, Joel Olsteen and others of a similar vein. While there are some points in the book with which I disagreed (like the somewhat pugnacious way in which he attempts to differentiate and dismiss those of “liberal” or “postmodern” persuasions), his analysis of the contemporary church is insightful.
The beginning of his book and title of his first chapter, “The Evangelical Myth,” has many political, social and religious implications. Politically, he is right to feel concerned about the growing partnership of political and religious parties. While many feel that certain political wings (both liberal and conservative) have been co-opted by very specific religious ideologies, Smith rightly asserts that one should necessarily be concerned about such a pairing. In contrast to the words and life of Jesus which emphasize the meek and the poor (those historically subjugated through politics), the delusions regarding the “myth” of an American civil religion foster disparaging ideas regarding the “Kingdom of God” and the “Kingdom of Man.”
One way in which these disparaging ideas manifest themselves is through society. In light of the growing pandemic of megachurch spirituality, Smith illuminates the parallels between the growth in megachurches and the lack of reduction to global ailments (e.g. poverty, violence, etc.). He correctly points in that, in the event that megachurches were cultivating the amount of believers they claim by way of church attendance, one would hope to see significant changes in society; however, affected in part by the myth of civil American religion, these believers often opt into (or know no alternative of) the shallow spirituality fostered in such churches.
Cole’s metaphor and use of the term “New Provincialism” (NP) is affective and persuasive. His allusion to the theology of premillenialism and it’s somewhat heretical past and its rapid surge into mainstream evangelicalism is one illustration of how New Provincialism has manifested itself into Christianity today. One additional way in which NP has shown itself in a dangerous way is the “Triumph of Sentimentality.” While modern worship fosters a sort of consumer approach to worship in church living (in that if the worship service is not poppy enough or the sermon is not persuasive enough or the variety in a service is lacking), it has the effect of perpetuating the same short attention span (and, thus, lack of depth in understanding and practice) that many forms of popular, contemporary culture does.
To addition to fostering that same consumeristic approach to church, NP celebrates “more is better” much like the culture we are in. The success of megachurches is indicative of God’s blessing and the proliferation of their ideas is a sign that this is how the church is supposed to act and grow. Or so they tell us. He presents some pretty wonderful quantitative data to illustrate that the growth of these churches is not an accurate reflection of the growth of the Church as a whole (for example, as mentioned earlier, lack of social ailments being remedied).
However, here is my second (and last) disagreement with an observation of his. While dismissing megachurches and the addition of numbers which are supposed to indicate growth and blessing, he then moves to discuss successful churches elsewhere in the world using only multiplication. While initially, this does seem to align itself more with at least Genesis commandments for the church (“Be fruitful and multiply”), he too falls into the numbers game. And I just wonder how indicative even that method of church counting is of the actual state of the church. When I think about the differences of adding to a church and multiplying churches and, thus, adding to the numbers associated with it, it’s almost the same thing. Maybe there’s a better way to measure the growth of the kingdom.
Here’s a pretty undeveloped approach (that I’m hashing out in this review): what if it’s more about volume than numbers? While numbers can be telling, as he notes, they can often be misleading or even intentionally deceptive. What if, instead of measuring the numbers, we measure a more holistic evaluation of Christians? What if it’s the multiplication of the two and an additional variable? What if we measured the numbers within a church (let’s say their height) and the number of churches and believers planted because of that (their width) and the effects of the church (their depth)? There can be thousands of people in thousands of churches but if their spirituality is ineffectual can we actually say that’s a burgeoning body of Christians? Are they really imbued with a sense of God’s purpose for this world (the enacting of the Kingdom of God in the World of Man as Christ made known in the Avinu prayer)? While even this cannot fully describe the people of God and their effects, I feel like it could better describe the status of Christianity and Christians than pure numbers.
So, with my two very minor issues with this book (his obvious concern/disdain for progressive/”liberal” believers and the question of numbers), this was a refreshing book. I recommend reading this alongside “A People’s History of Christianity” by Diane Butler. The observations by Cole will frustrate you in their truth and possibly provide clarity to ideas you may already have about the church. And Butler’s book will invigorate your spirit in knowing that it has not, is not and will not always be the way that it is today. Alternate reading the chapters. I coincidentally got these books at the same time and alternated between the two chapter by chapter. It was a roller coaster.
While this review has a lot of complaints about Christianity, it is only because I love it and want it to be the fullest it can be.
To read more of my ideas and book reviews, visit warrenwade.wordpress.com. I’m new to this game and would love your input and insights. Leave me complaints, concerns, encouragement, ideas. Whatever you want.
Sep 22nd, 2009
radrob6500
I was also intrigued by the title of this book. The decline of the Evangelical church is all the rage today, especially, the main line denominations. I have been in Youth Ministry for over 20 years and have seen a lot of change in culture in that time, as well as change in the church. I struggled through the worship wars when it really was a war. The dust has settled I think. Who knows what the next war will be? And this is my problem with the church! Why does there have to be a war over every thing big and small? If you want to point a finger at the decline of the Evangelical Church that is the number one place to start. Churches have been fighting over stuff for years. Our culture has watched while the body has beat itself up. Considering the battles that I have seen in the churches that I have served (Baptist, Presbyterian-PCA, and United Methodist), I’m not surprised that people are disinterested with the church.
The Book “UnChristian” by David Kinnaman and Gabe Lyons has a more accurate diagnosis of the decline of the Evangelical church than anyone else I’ve read or heard.
I agree that there are churches who have weak theology and doctrine. Is that really new? “Liberal” theology has been around since the beginning. There are churches who water it down and sugar coat the message to make it more appealing to the masses, but not all. And I would be careful about lumping Bill Hybels, Joel Osteen, and others into that category.
While I don’t think that I would feel at home in a Mega Church like Willow Creek or Saddle Back. I’m not going to judge what God has called them to do or whether they have or have not made an impact for the kingdom of God. I think making such a judgment is ridiculous. And I’m sure there are plenty of people at these churches that can testify about the great things that God is doing in their lives.
I do have a problem with the Christian Industrial Machine. My biggest problem is that it has created this Christian Sub-culture that hides in a bunker. I don’t have a problem with people selling albums or books. I don’t have a problem with Warren Cole Smith selling books. Whether He likes it or not he is a part of the same Industrial Machine that he is criticizing. I bought his book at a “Christian Bookstore”. He has to sell books, advertise, and sell himself to make a living.
Smith refers to Michael Card on several occasions in the book. While I’m not a huge fan of his music, I don’t discount his ministry and calling to lead others in worship. But to imply that modern “Worship” has contributed to the decline of the Evangelical church because it makes money is a little hypocritical.
My problem is that we have created this “us against them” mentality. This “Christian” sub culture has so isolated themselves in almost every way from the outside world that they can’t communicate or relate to our present culture. Yes, they know their Bible, but they can’t relate it to anyone. Most interaction with the outside world is heated arguments over beliefs. You see “Christians” shooting their mouth off on TV and other media all the time. I’m not saying that we don’t have the right when asked to share the hope that is within us but do we have to be so obnoxious about it. I won’t even talk about how much damage the “Christian Political Machine” has done over the years.
The Media discussion in the book is another puzzling thing to me. I’d like to know what the huge difference is between reading scripture or lyrics in a hymnal and reading them on a screen. It’s not the medium. It’s the way it’s presented. I don’t see anywhere in scripture where it says we can’t worship God in different ways or through different media mediums. I’m sure when someone came up with the idea of using hymnals somebody had a cow.
I don’t like that my church has to pay CCLI several hundred dollars a year. Who ever came up with that idea was brilliant. I wished I would of thought of that one. I certainly hope that the artists are getting the majority of the royalties. If there is one thing with the Modern Worship machine that I have a problem with it would be CCLI. If your band plays a David Crowder song during worship they shouldn’t have to pay to do so. Sure, give him credit for the song. But the church is not recording it for resale. If they do then they need to get permission from the artist and then pay royalties to the artist/publisher.
Another thing in the book that really bothered me was the criticism of “short term missions”. As a youth minister Short Term Missions are a way for me to introduce students to serving not only locally but overseas. God may be calling some of my students to be missionary’s. What are they supposed to wait until there old enough? Then they choose to be a missionary without any experience whatsoever. I didn’t want to become a youth minister because It just popped in their one day. I did because I experienced it.
I like the direction that some churches are heading in. Churches that are passionate about the Word of God, passionate about worship, and passionate about serving and caring for others. Have we got it all figured out? Do we always do it right? Of course not.
I would not recommend this book to anyone. I think it is critical and obviously motivated by a traditionalist and fundamentalist agenda. I know we need to remember our history. Our History is God’s word, period. Remember the Sabbath, Remember the Sacraments, all of the things that the Scriptures tell us to remember, especially who God is and what He wants us to be. Everything sense then has been influenced by culture and interpretation. I’m not here to figure out whether Jesus would have used Media Shout or Powerpoint to convey his message.
Speaking of “church history”, maybe I’ll start another “Crusade” and force people to accept Christ at gunpoint.
Oct 27th, 2009
chadkmiller
I picked up this book awhile back and have really enjoyed Warren Cole Smith’s blatant honesty about the Evangelical Church. I followed a very similar path and considered myself Evangelical for a very long time. As he writes, he quickly saw the term becoming something much different than he signed on for. The mass commercialization and politicalization of Evangelicals became quite alarming. This books goes beyond that taking you on a journey where the church can find herself again. I challenge you to check it out soon!
Chadkmiller
http://chadkmiller.wordpress.com
@chadkmiller
Nov 23rd, 2009
Benjamin Sternke
I just finished reading Warren Cole Smith’s book A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church, and wanted to post a few thoughts about it.
It’s easy to find books that critique American evangelicalism. It’s not so easy to find books that do it with the kind of rootedness in history, tradition, and theology that Smith has. He skillfully points out several pathologies that infect much of American evangelicalism:
An unmooring from historical theology and tradition that has resulted in a “new provincialism.”
A triumph of sentimentality over reality.
An inextricable connection to the “Christian-industrial complex” that is more interested in selling merchandise than living out the gospel.
A “body count” philosophy of evangelism that counts numbers of “decisions” and people in a building instead of true conversions to Christ.
A wholly uncritical acceptance of mass media and video and broadcast technology as philosophically neutral.
If there any criticisms to be leveled at Smith’s book, he tends to root many of his arguments in the same few sources, almost all of which come from a Reformed theological tradition. But his argument is nonetheless convincing and I think his diagnosis is correct: unless these pathologies are dealt with, American evangelicalism will die (at least in its current form), which, of course, might be a good thing.
Smith doesn’t stop there, though. He goes on to offer a remedy, and that remedy is rooted in church planting. Instead of monolithic churches growing larger and larger, putting more and more people under one roof, he advocates planting more and more churches (a man after my own heart!). The advantages are many, according to Smith:
It provides more opportunities for ministry
It provides greater accountability
It’s multiplicative (not simply additive)
It demonstrates a dying to self (no monuments to one person’s preaching prowess or leadership greatness)
It’s biblical
I wholeheartedly agree. It was refreshing to read a book that seems to diagnose the problems well and advocate a solution that lines up with the way we are attempting to plant our church community here in Fort Wayne.
EDIT: I have one more criticism of Smith’s book: he lumps “emerging” church into the same lot as Joel Osteen, which betrays a severe lack of understanding about where most of these people are coming from. It is one of the issues that Jim Belcher pointed out in his book Deep Church, namely that “postmodernism” means two different things, depending on who you are listening to. Most “emerging” church folks point to post-modernism as a break from modernism, while others (like Smith) see post-modernism as an extension and strengthening of modernism: hyper-modernism. In this way, many times the two sides talk past one another, when in actuality they agree on a lot.
Jan 10th, 2010
for “A Lover’s Quarrel with the Evangelical Church by Warren Cole Smith”
You must be logged in as a VIRAL BLOGGER to post a review.